Human Studies

Persistent pain after total knee replacement is an underestimated outcome leading to significant health burden. Sensory testing has been explored to help surgeons in decision making and better patient selection. Patients with different chronic pain syndromes exhibit a poor descending pain inhibition that can be quantified through experimental paradigms (conditioned pain modulation). A poor preoperative descending pain inhibition response predicted persistence of pain after surgery in previous studies.

Real-world data are sparse on longitudinal associations of opioid use with pain interference with activities (PIA) and daily function with osteoarthritis (OA) in the USA.

Accumulating evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms may hold great potential in the field of pain. We systematically reviewed the literature exploring epigenetic mechanisms in people with pain. Four databases have been interrogated: MEDLINE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, Scopus, and Web of Science, following PRISMA guidelines in conducting study selection and assessment. Thirty-seven studies were included. Studies explored epigenetics in conditions such as fibromyalgia, CRPS, neuropathies, or osteoarthritis. Research focussed on genome-wide and gene-specific DNA methylation, and miRNA expression. Bioinformatics analyses exploring miRNA-associated molecular pathways were also performed. Several genes already known for their role in pain (BDNF, HDAC4, PRKG1, IL-17, TNFRSF13B, etc.), and several miRNAs linked to inflammatory regulation, nociceptive signalling and protein kinases functions have been found to differ significantly between people with chronic pain and healthy controls. Although the studies included were cross-sectional in nature, and no conclusion on causal links between epigenetic changes and pain could be drawn, we summarised the large amount of data available in literature on the topic, highlighting results that have been replicated by independent investigations. The field of pain epigenetics appears very exciting and has all the potential to lead to remarkable scientific advances. However, high-quality, well-powered, longitudinal studies are warranted. Perspective: Though more high-quality research is needed, available research exploring epigenetic mechanisms or miRNAs in people with pain shows that genes regulating synaptic plasticity and excitability, protein kinases, and elements of the immune system might hold great potential in understanding the pathophysiology of different conditions.

Quantitative sensory testing is used to assess somatosensory function in humans. The protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) provides comprehensive normative values using defined tools; however, some of these may not be feasible in low-resource settings.

Different pain types may be encoded in different brain circuits. Here, we examine similarities and differences in brain processing of visceral and somatic pain. We analyze data from seven fMRI studies (N = 165) and five types of pain and discomfort (esophageal, gastric, and rectal distension, cutaneous thermal stimulation, and vulvar pressure) to establish and validate generalizable pain representations. We first evaluate an established multivariate brain measure, the Neurologic Pain Signature (NPS), as a common nociceptive pain system across pain types. Then, we develop a multivariate classifier to distinguish visceral from somatic pain. The NPS responds robustly in 98% of participants across pain types, correlates with perceived intensity of visceral pain and discomfort, and shows specificity to pain when compared with cognitive and affective conditions from twelve additional studies (N = 180). Pre-defined signatures for non-pain negative affect do not respond to visceral pain. The visceral versus the somatic classifier reliably distinguishes somatic (thermal) from visceral (rectal) stimulation in both cross-validation and independent cohorts. Other pain types reflect mixtures of somatic and visceral patterns. These results validate the NPS as measuring a common core nociceptive pain system across pain types, and provide a new classifier for visceral versus somatic pain.

The aim of this study was to examine the association between the length of time between an emergency department (ED) visit and the subsequent initiation of physical therapist intervention for low back pain (LBP) on 1-year LBP-related health care utilization (ie, surgery, advanced imaging, injections, long-term opioid use, ED visits) and costs.