Browse by Audience
Childhood trauma has been linked to neuropathic pain in noncancer populations, but its relationship with cancer treatment-related neuropathic pain is unknown.
This study examined psychosocial pain treatment moderation in a secondary analysis of a trial that compared cognitive therapy (CT), mindfulness-meditation (MM), and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) for chronic low back pain (CLBP). The Limit, Activate and Enhance (LA&E) model of moderation provided a framework for testing a priori hypotheses. Adult participants (N=69) with CLBP completed a pre-treatment assessment of hypothesized moderators: pain catastrophizing, brain state as assessed by electroencephalogram, mindful observing, and non-reactivity. Outcomes were pain interference, characteristic pain intensity, physical function, and depression, assessed at pre- and post-treatment. Moderation analyses found significant interaction effects, specifically: (1) higher and lower baseline pain catastrophizing was associated with greater improvement in pain intensity in MM and MBCT, respectively; (2) higher baseline theta power was associated with greater improvement in depression in MBCT and interfered with response to CT; (3) lower baseline non-reactivity was associated with greater improvement in physical function in MM while higher non-reactivity was associated with greater improvement in MBCT. The findings support the possibility that different patients are more or less likely to benefit from various treatments. Theory-driven moderation research has the capacity to inform the development of patient-treatment matching algorithms to optimize outcome. Perspective: This study presents preliminary findings from theory-driven tests of the moderators of mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for chronic low back pain. The results of such analyses may inform the understanding of for whom various evidence-based psychosocial pain treatments may engender the most meaningful benefits.
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major cause of global disability and improving management is essential. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a promising treatment for chronic pain but has not been modified for physical therapy. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) compared physical therapy informed by Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (PACT) against standard care physical therapy for patients with CLBP. Patients with CLBP (duration ≥12 weeks, mean 3 years) were recruited from physical therapy clinics in four UK public hospitals. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) at 3 months' post randomization was the primary outcome. 248 participants (59% female, mean age=48) were recruited and 219 (88•3%) completed measures at 3 and/or 12 months' follow-up. At 3 months, PACT participants reported better outcomes for disability (RMDQ mean difference =1•07, p=0•037, 95%CI -2•08 to -0•07, d=0•2), Patient Specific Functioning (p=0.008), SF12 physical health (p=0.032), and treatment credibility (p<0.001). At 12 months' follow-up there were no significant differences between groups. PACT was acceptable to patients and clinicians and feasible to deliver. Physical therapists incorporated psychological principles successfully and treatment was delivered with high (≥80%) fidelity. Our results may inform the management of CLBP, with potential benefits for patients, health care providers and society. PERSPECTIVE: Psychologically informed physical therapy has great potential but there are challenges in implementation. The training and support included in the PACT trial enabled the intervention to be delivered as planned. This successfully reduced disability in the short but not long term. Findings could inform physical therapists' treatment of CLBP.
Opioid analgesic misuse by patients with chronic non-cancer pain is increasing in Western countries. To determine the extent of opioid misuse by patients with chronic non-cancer pain followed at a French pain management clinic. A questionnaire on pain (severity, causes and management) and opioid misuse (based on the 11 DSM-V criteria for substance abuse disorders) was administered by a health professional to patients during a short hospitalization. During the study period (September 1, 2015 to March 31, 2016), 52 patients (73.1% women; median age = 50 years [IQR: 43-57]) responded to the questionnaire. Chronic pain was caused by fibromyalgia in 55.6% of patients, and was mainly classified as neurogenic (32.6%), nociceptive (30.4%), and psychosomatic (15.2%). At hospitalization, the median pain visual analog scale score was 7/10 [IQR: 6-8], despite the ongoing treatment. The opioid misuse evaluation suggested the presence of misuse in 76.9% of patients (≥2 DSM-V criteria) that was severe in 52% of patients (≥6 DSM-V criteria). Our data highlight the high prevalence of misuse of prescribed opioids by adults with chronic non-cancer pain. A consultation with an addiction specialist should be included in the management of such patients.
Previous studies have indicated a positive relationship between self-compassion and psychological and emotional well-being in chronic pain populations. However, evidence on the role and mechanisms of self-compassion in pain perception is largely limited. The current study was designed to investigate the effects and a potential mechanism of self-compassion on experimental pain. Thirty healthy participants underwent a compassionate self-talk protocol, which was followed by cold pain exposure during which high-frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV) was evaluated. The compassionate self-talk protocol successfully generated compassionate statements among the participants. Our behavioral data showed lower pain ratings in the self-compassion compared to the control condition. Moreover, self-compassion manipulation resulted in higher HF-HRV during pain, which was associated with lower pain ratings. We present interesting findings that a short period of compassionate self-talk may decrease experimental pain as well as mechanistic evidence surrounding bodily control over pain-related arousal indicated by HF-HRV. PERSPECTIVE: This study presents the first line of evidence that a short period of compassionate self-talk may be sufficient to reduce experimental pain. We also demonstrate increased bodily control as a potential mechanism underlying this effect.
Ketamine, an anesthetic adjunct, is routinely administered as part of a balanced general anesthetic technique. We recently showed that the acute analgesic and dissociation properties of ketamine are separable to suggest that distinct neural circuits underlie these states.
Sleep quality and chronic neck pain (NP) are associated. However, the genetic influences on this association have not been explored. This study investigated the genetic and environmental influences on the association between sleep quality and chronic NP.
Contributors to the ongoing epidemic of prescription opioid abuse, addiction, and death include opioid tolerance, withdrawal symptoms, and possibly opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Thirty stable chronic non-malignant pain patients entered a six-month long, randomized, double-blind, dose-response, two-center trial of the potent opioid levorphanol, conducted over a decade ago during an era of permissive opioid prescribing. Eleven were taking no opioids at study entry and eleven were taking between 35-122 morphine equivalents (MEQ). Five weeks titration preceded twenty weeks stable dosing. Tolerance and OIH were inferred individually based on chronic pain ratings, Brief Pain Inventory scores, and results of the Brief Thermal Sensitization (BTS) model at five opioid dosing sessions. Seventeen patients completed. The average final daily opioid dose was 132; range 14-300; average addition 105 MEQ. After observed dosing, the BTS area of hyperalgesia changed minimally but the painfulness of skin heating was reduced. Weekly 0-100 VAS pain ratings (average 64 at study entry, 48 at end titration, 45 at end stable dosing) decreased a median 19%, but eight completed with higher VAS ratings. Three completers had evidence of both tolerance and hyperalgesia. A fully-powered trial similar to this feasibility study is ethically questionable. A large-scale pragmatic trial is more realistic. Trial Registration: NCT00275249 Evolution of Analgesic Tolerance With Opioids Perspective: A double-blind, six-month, high-dose opioid feasibility trial, completed years ago, provides critically important data for clinically defining analgesic tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH). Overall benefit was small, and 18% of patients had evidence of both tolerance and OIH. Future work requires a different approach than a classic RCT design.
Embedded behavioral medicine services are a common component of multidisciplinary chronic pain treatment programs. However, few studies have studied whether these services are associated with improved treatment outcomes.
Introduction There is limited evidence for effect of interventional treatment, and pragmatic studies are needed to assess these interventions within a clinical setting. The aim of this study was to describe patients referred to an interventional pain clinic and investigate responses after spinal intervention in general and for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transforaminal epidural corticosteroid administration (TECA), specifically. Methods This is a prospective, non-controlled study of patients with chronic spinal pain. The procedures were performed in accordance with the Spine Intervention Society recommendations. Outcome data after a median of 4.5 months are presented, and for those treated with RFA also after 6 and 12 months. Results Among 815 patients, 190 patients underwent diagnostic blocks only and 625 interventional treatment, of these 94 RFA and 246 TECA. Of the whole sample 70% reported pain reduction, for 49% ≥ 50%, while 9% were pain free (p < 0.001). Highest pain intensity decreased from 7.1 to 5.4 [95% Confidence Interval of the Difference (95%-CI): 1.4-1.9] (p < 0.001), while Euroqual – visual analogue scale for general health (EQ-VAS) improved from 48 to 58 (95%-CI: 7.6-11.9) (p < 0.001), and Euroqual-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Index for health related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L Index) from 0.489 to 0.628 (95%-CI: 0.123-0.157) (p < 0.001). The proportions, not taking analgesics, increased from 16% to 30%, and proportion taking strong opioids decreased from 14% to 9% (p < 0.001). We found no significant change in proportion receiving physiotherapy/other treatment nor occupational status. No complications were reported. Among patients treated with RFA, 77% reported pain reduction, for 56% ≥ 50%, while 9% were pain free (p < 0.001). Highest pain intensity decreased from 6.9 to 4.6 (95%-CI: 1.6-3.0) (p < 0.001), while EQ-VAS improved from 47 to 57 (95%-CI: 4.8-13.6 (p < 0.001), and EQ-5D-5L Index from 0.489 to 0.643 (95%-CI: 0.117-0.191) (p < 0.001). The proportion not taking analgesics, increased from 7% to 23% and proportion taking strong opioids decreased from 16% to 10%. Among patients who responded at 6- and 12-month follow up, the proportions reporting pain reduction, EQ-VAS, and EQ-5D-5L Index remained significantly improved from baseline, and the change in proportions taking analgesic and opioids achieved statistical significance. We found no significant change in proportion receiving physiotherapy/other treatment nor occupational status. Among patients treated with TECA, 58% reported pain reduction, for 36% ≥ 50%, while 5% were pain free (p < 0.001). Highest pain intensity decreased from 7.2 to 6.2 (95%-CI 0.5-1.4) (p < 0.001), while EQ-VAS improved from 46 to 52 (95%-CI: 2.0-3.6) (p < 0.001), and EQ-5D-5L Index from 0.456 to 0.571 (95%-CI: 0.077-0.138) (p < 0.001). The proportions, not taking analgesics, increased from 17% to 27% and proportion taking strong opioids decreased from 15% to 10%, but the changes did not reach statistical significance. We found no significant changes in the proportion who recieved physiotherapy/other treatment nor occupational status. Conclusion The study demonstrates substantial short-term responses after spinal intervention and long-lasting improvement for a subsample of the RFA treated patients. We observed larger proportions reporting pain reduction among those treated with cervical RFA. Implementation Quality assessment should be implemented in interventional pain clinics to improve treatment quality.