Accepted

Chemotherapy-induced neuropathy (CIN) is a major dose-limiting side effect of anticancer therapy that can compel therapy discontinuation. Inadequate analgesic efficacy of current pharmacological approaches requires the identification of innovative therapeutics and, hence, the purpose of this study is to conduct a preclinical evaluation of the efficacy of DDD-028, a versatile pentacyclic pyridoindole derivative, against paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain. In two separate experiments, DDD-028 was administered per os acutely (1-25 mg kg) or repeatedly (10 mg kg) in paclitaxel-treated rats. The response to mechanical noxious stimulus (paw pressure) as well as to non-noxious mechanical (von Frey) and thermal (cold plate) stimuli was investigated. Acute administration of DDD-028 induced a dose-dependent anti-neuropathic pain effect in all tests performed. Further, repeated daily treatment for 18 consecutive days (starting the first day of paclitaxel administration) significantly reduced the development of pain over time without the development of tolerance to the anti-hyperalgesic effect. Ex vivo analysis showed that DDD-028 was able to reduce oxidative damage of dorsal root ganglia as evidenced by the increase in the level of carbonylated proteins and the decrease in catalase activity. In the lumbar spinal cord, periaqueductal gray matter, thalamus, and somatosensory cortex 1, DDD-28 significantly prevented the activation of microglia and astrocytes. The pharmacodynamic study revealed that the pain-relieving effects of DDD-028 were fully blocked by both the non-selective nicotinic receptor (nAChR) antagonist mecamylamine and by the selective α7 nAChR antagonist methyllycaconitine. In conclusion, DDD-028 was active in reducing paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain after single or repeated administrations without tolerance development and displaying a double symptomatic and neuroprotective profile. DDD-028 could represent a valuable candidate for the treatment of CIN.

Many people with chronic pain escalate their opioid dosage to counteract tolerance effects. A treatment regimen consisting of placebos admixed with opioids has been suggested as a possible therapeutic option that could reduce the harm of long-term opioid use. However, the analgesic efficacy of such a regimen requires further investigation before widespread adoption. We have recently reported that a 4-day pharmacological conditioning procedure, which paired morphine (6 mg/kg) with contextual cues, elicited placebo analgesia in subpopulations of male (35%) and female (25%) rats with sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury (CCI). Here, we investigated how an escalating morphine dosage during conditioning affects the incidence and strength of placebo analgesia. Forty-four male, Sprague-Dawley rats received CCI. Thirty-eight (86%) rats developed strong cold allodynia by day 6 post-surgery, as measured by hind paw withdrawal (HPW) behaviour on a 5°C cold plate (120 s). In this experiment, pharmacological conditioning consisted of an escalating morphine dose over 4 days (8/9/10/12 mg/kg). This dosing regimen produced strong reductions in HPW behaviour and counteracted the effects of morphine tolerance during conditioning. However, none of the rats given the placebo treatment (n = 12) demonstrated reductions in HPW behaviour when morphine was substituted for saline (i.e. placebo analgesia), but instead showed a strong behavioural response (rearing). These results demonstrate that a high, escalating dose of morphine failed to produce conditioned placebo analgesia in rats with CCI. It is possible that admixing placebos with opioids may be similarly ineffective in chronic pain patients when the opioids regimen is high or escalating.