Browse by Audience
MEMBER

Update Your Profile
Member Spotlights
Refer a Member: IASP Champions
Join a Special Interest Group (SIG)
Find a Chapter
Join Now

RESEARCHER

PAIN
PAIN Reports
Pain Research Forum
Papers of the Week
Webinars and Podcasts
Events

HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Online Learning - PERC
Webinars & Podcasts
Curricula
Graduate Opportunities
Events

PATIENT & CAREGIVER

RELIEF News
Resources for Living with Pain
Global Alliance of Partners in Pain Advocacy (GAPPA)
Events

PARTNER

Support IASP
Sponsor an Event
Become a Partner

gy2022-1-3
I am a
IASP Logo
Home I AM A Search Login

Papers of the Week

Home / Publications / Pain Research Forum / Papers of the Week / Comparing physicians’ and patients’ reporting on adverse reactions in randomized trials on acupuncture-a secondary data analysis.

< BACK TO ARCHIVE


2019 Aug 22


BMC Complement Altern Med


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31438954?dopt=Abstract


19


1

Comparing physicians’ and patients’ reporting on adverse reactions in randomized trials on acupuncture-a secondary data analysis.

Authors

Comparing physicians' and patients' reporting on adverse reactions in randomized trials on acupuncture-a secondary data analysis.
Schwaneberg T, Witt CM, Roll S, Pach D
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019 Aug 22; 19(1):223.
PMID: 31438954.

Abstract

We aimed to compare patients' and physicians' safety reporting using data from large acupuncture trials (44,818 patients) and to determine associations between patient characteristics and reporting of adverse reactions.
Read This Paper