Pharmacology/Drug Development

There is growing interest in drug repositioning to find new therapeutic indications for drugs already approved for use in people. Lovastatin is an FDA approved drug that has been used clinically for over a decade as a lipid-lowering medication. While lovastatin is classically considered to act as a hydroxymethylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase inhibitor, the present series of studies reveal a novel lovastatin effect, that being as a Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) antagonist. Lovastatin selectively inhibits lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TLR4-NF-κB activation without affecting signaling by other homologous TLRs. In vitro biophysical binding and cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) show that lovastatin is recognized by TLR4's coreceptor myeloid differentiation protein 2 (MD-2). This finding is supported by molecular dynamics simulations that lovastatin targets the LPS binding pocket of MD-2 and lovastatin binding stabilizes the MD-2 conformation. In vitro studies of BV-2 microglial cells revealed that lovastatin inhibits multiple effects of LPS, including activation of NFkB; mRNA expression of tumor necrosis factor-a, interleukin-6 and cyclo-oxygenase 2; production of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species; as well as phagocytic activity. Furthermore, intrathecal delivery of lovastatin over lumbosacral spinal cord of rats attenuated both neuropathic pain from sciatic nerve injury and expression of the microglial activation marker CD11 in lumbar spinal cord dorsal horn. Given the well-established role of microglia and proinflammatory signaling in neuropathic pain, these data are supportive that lovastatin, as a TLR4 antagonist, may be productively repurposed for treating chronic pain.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) modulates nociception in the spinal cord, but little is known about its mechanisms of release. We measured NPY release in situ using the internalization of its Y1 receptor in dorsal horn neurons. Y1 receptor immunoreactivity was normally localized to the cell surface, but addition of NPY to spinal cord slices increased the number of neurons with Y1 internalization in a biphasic fashion (ECs of 1 nM and 1 μM). Depolarization with KCl, capsaicin, or the protein kinase A activator 6-benzoyl-cAMP also induced Y1 receptor internalization, presumably by releasing NPY. NMDA receptor activation in the presence of BVT948, an inhibitor of protein tyrosine phosphatases, also released NPY. Electrical stimulation of the dorsal horn frequency-dependently induced NPY release; and this was decreased by the Y1 antagonist BIBO3304, the Nav channel blocker lidocaine, or the Cav2 channel blocker ω-conotoxin MVIIC. Dorsal root immersion in capsaicin, but not its electrical stimulation, also induced NPY release. This was blocked by CNQX, suggesting that part of the NPY released by capsaicin was from dorsal horn neurons receiving synapses from primary afferents and not from the afferent themselves. Mechanical stimulation in vivo, with rub or clamp of the hindpaw, elicited robust Y1 receptor internalization in rats with spared nerve injury but not sham surgery. In summary, NPY is released from dorsal horn interneurons or primary afferent terminals by electrical stimulation and by activation of TRPV1, PKA or NMDA receptors in. Furthermore, NPY release evoked by noxious and tactile stimuli increases after peripheral nerve injury.

Mu opioid receptor (MOR)-targeting analgesics are efficacious pain treatments, but notorious for their abuse potential. In preclinical animal models, co administration of traditional kappa opioid receptor (KOR)-targeting agonists with MOR-targeting analgesics can decrease reward and potentiate analgesia. However, traditional KOR-targeting agonists are well known for inducing anti-therapeutic side effects (psychotomimesis, depression, anxiety, dysphoria). Recent data suggest that some functionally selective, or biased, KOR-targeting agonists might retain the therapeutic effects of KOR activation without inducing undesirable side effects. Nalfurafine, used safely in Japan since 2009 for uremic pruritus, is one such functionally selective KOR-targeting agonist. Here, we quantify the bias of nalfurafine and several other KOR agonists relative to an unbiased reference standard (U50,488), and show that nalfurafine and EOM-salvinorin-B demonstrate marked G protein-signaling bias. While nalfurafine (0.015 mg/kg) and EOM-salvinorin-B (1 mg/kg) produced spinal anti-nociception equivalent to 5 mg/kg U50,488, only nalfurafine significantly enhanced the supraspinal analgesic effect of 5 mg/kg morphine. In addition, 0.015 mg/kg nalfurafine did not produce significant conditioned place aversion (CPA), yet retained the ability to reduce morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in C57BL/6J mice. Nalfurafine and EOM-salvinorin-B each produced robust inhibition of both spontaneous and morphine-stimulated locomotor behavior, suggesting a persistence of sedative effects when co-administered with morphine. Taken together, these findings suggest that nalfurafine produces analgesic augmentation, while also reducing opioid-induced reward with less risk of dysphoria. Thus, adjuvant administration of G protein-biased KOR agonists like nalfurafine may be beneficial in enhancing the therapeutic potential of MOR-targeting analgesics, such as morphine. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: N/A.