Browse by Audience
Diabetes mellitus is becoming increasingly common worldwide. As this occurs, there will be an increase in the prevalence of known comorbidities from this disorder of glucose metabolism. One of the most disabling adverse comorbidities is diabetic neuropathy. The most common neuropathic manifestation is distal symmetric polyneuropathy, which can lead to sensory disturbances, including diminished protective sense, making patients prone to foot injuries. However, focal, multifocal, and autonomic neuropathies are also common. Diabetic nerve pain and Charcot osteoarthropathy are advanced neuropathic conditions that portend a severe deterioration in quality of life. To combat these symptoms, along with glycemic control and establishment of health care systems to educate and support patients with the complexities of diabetes, there are pharmacologic remedies to ameliorate the neurologic symptoms. Several guidelines and review boards generally recommend the use of tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin/norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors, α-2-delta ligands, and anticonvulsants as medications to improve painful diabetic neuropathy and quality of life.
Learn More >1) To assess the feasibility of research methods to test a self-management intervention aimed at preventing acute to chronic pain transition in patients with major lower extremity trauma (iPACT-E-Trauma) and 2) to evaluate its potential effects at three and six months postinjury. Design. A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel groups.
Learn More >Central pain associated with changes in sensory thresholds is one of the most enduring consequences of major trauma. Yet it remains sparsely studied among community-dwelling survivors of moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Learn More >This study quantified risks of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and mortality events among patients with migraine receiving prophylaxis.
Learn More >The diverse etiologies of conditions characterized by chronic pain require molecular assessment. Over recent decades, progress in research has enabled studying of the genetic mechanisms underlying pain and consequently realistic clinical solutions. Genetic linkage has unveiled rare single-gene contributions to pain disorders, whilst advances in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) define multigenic mechanisms in conditions such as back pain and migraine. Advances in DNA sequencing now additionally allow us to efficiently identify mutations underlying congenic pain syndromes and diagnose individuals at risk of developing ongoing pain. In the laboratory, targeted modulation of gene expression with RNA interference, as well as the development of transgenic mouse models, has exponentially expanded our ability to interrogate the molecular cascades behind nociceptive and chronic pain. Furthermore, the recent evolution of CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene editing has produced a simple yet effective method of altering the genome to alleviate ongoing pain. This genetic revolution will undoubtedly lead to more personalized therapeutics, which with consideration of environmental risk factors should combat clinical pain. We believe these improvements will occur in the next few decades. A video accompanying this abstract is available online as Supplemental Digital Content at http://links.lww.com/PAIN/A804.
Learn More >Multiple cranial nerve blocks of the greater and lesser occipital, supraorbital, supratrochlear and auriculotemporal nerves are widely used in the treatment of primary headaches. We present efficacy and safety data for these procedures.
Learn More >The impact of vitamin D on sensory function, including pain processing, has been receiving increasing attention. Indeed, vitamin D deficiency is associated with various chronic pain conditions, and several lines of evidence indicate that vitamin D supplementation may trigger pain relief. However, the underlying mechanisms of action remain poorly understood. We used inflammatory and non-inflammatory rat models of chronic pain to evaluate the benefits of vitamin D (cholecalciferol) on pain symptoms. We found that cholecalciferol supplementation improved mechanical nociceptive thresholds in monoarthritic animals and reduced mechanical hyperalgesia and cold allodynia in a model of mononeuropathy. Transcriptomic analysis of cerebrum, dorsal root ganglia, and spinal cord tissues indicate that cholecalciferol supplementation induces a massive gene dysregulation which, in the cerebrum, is associated with opioid signaling (23 genes), nociception (14), and allodynia (8), and, in the dorsal root ganglia, with axonal guidance (37 genes) and nociception (17). Among the identified cerebral dysregulated nociception-, allodynia-, and opioid-associated genes, 21 can be associated with vitamin D metabolism. However, it appears that their expression is modulated by intermediate regulators such as diverse protein kinases and not, as expected, by the vitamin D receptor. Overall, several genes-Oxt, Pdyn, Penk, Pomc, Pth, Tac1, and Tgfb1-encoding for peptides/hormones stand out as top candidates to explain the therapeutic benefit of vitamin D supplementation. Further studies are now warranted to detail the precise mechanisms of action but also the most favorable doses and time windows for pain relief.
Learn More >The current Phase 2b study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for migraine (MBCT-M) to reduce migraine-related disability in people with migraine.
Learn More >There are conflicting results about sex differences in the response to opioids for pain control and the role of potential influencing factors of these differences has not been investigated. We meta-analyzed differences and similarities between men and women in opioid response for pain control and investigated the potential influence of baseline pain intensity, age, body weight, and other factors in these findings. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched through January 15, 2019, for clinical studies in which opioids were administered for pain control. We included clinical studies in which (a) opioids were used to treat acute or chronic pain, (b) the response to opioids was broken down for men and women, and (c) the response to opioids was reported as (i) difference between baseline and final Visual Analog Scale of Pain Intensity (VASPI) score 30 minutes after opioid administration (Delta-VASPI at 30'), or daily dose of opioids (ii) self-administered by patients (patient-controlled analgesia PCA), or (iii) administered by physicians. Risk of bias was evaluated using ROBINS-I and the overall quality of evidence for primary outcomes was evaluated using the GRADE system. Globally, we included 40 comparisons (6,794 patients). Regarding acute pain, we found moderate quality of evidence that women and men do not differ in their response to opioids 30 minutes after their administration [Delta-VASPI at 30': mean difference, MD = 0.42 (-0.07; 0.91)]. We also found moderate quality of evidence that women self-administer lower daily amounts of opioids [daily PCA: standardized mean difference, SMD = -0.30 (-0.41; -0.18)]. Regarding chronic pain, we found low quality of evidence that women receive lower daily doses for non-cancer pain [MD = -36.42 (-57.86; -14.99)]. By contrast, we found very low quality of evidence that women and men do not differ in the daily dose of opioids for cancer pain [MD = -16.09 (-40.13; 7.94)]. Age, comorbid mental disorders, type of administration, type of opioids, type of patients, and body weight significantly modified these results. In conclusion, the results of the present meta-analysis suggest that men and women may differ in the response to opioids for pain relief, but these differences as well as similarities are significantly influenced by factors like age and comorbid mental disorders. However, the role of these factors is not usually evaluated in the prescription of opioids for pain control. There is an urgent need to conduct clinical trials on the use of opioid medications for pain, in which information about all possible influencing factors are provided and broken down for men and women.
Learn More >Spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to sensorimotor deficits and autonomic changes. Macrophages and microglia could be polarized into the classically activated pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype or the alternatively activated anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype. Transmembrane protein with unknown function 16F (TMEM16F) exhibits functional diversity and may contribute to microglial function. However, the effects of TMEM16F on the modulation of macrophage/microglial polarization are still not fully understood. In the study, TMEM16F up-regulation was detected after SCI in mice, and TMEM16F protein was found in macrophages/microglia in injured spinal cord sections. Depletion of TMEM16F improved motor function in male mice with SCI. M1-type macrophages/microglia accumulated in lower numbers in the injured spinal cord of TMEM16F-knockout (KO) mice. M2 polarization inhibited by SCI was improved in mice with TMEM16F deficiency. TMEM16F deletion also attenuated microglial/macrophage pro-inflammatory response. Furthermore, significant down-regulation of A disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17) was observed in TMEM16F-KO mice. Importantly, TMEM16F-promoted M1 polarization and -inhibited M1 polarization were largely associated with the suppression of ADAM17. Overall, our findings provided new insights into the regulatory mechanisms of macrophage/microglial polarization, thereby possibly facilitating the development of new therapeutic strategies for SCI through the regulation of TMEM16F/ADAM17 signaling.
Learn More >