I am a
Home I AM A Search Login

Papers of the Week


2020 Aug


J Obstet Gynaecol


40


6

Patient opinion of analgesia during external cephalic version at term in singleton pregnancy.

Authors

Rodríguez L, Osuna C, Pijoan JI, Cobos P, Centeno MM, Serna R, Jiménez A, Artola I, Melchor I, Martínez-Astorquiza T, Melchor JC, Burgos J
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug; 40(6):767-771.
PMID: 32648534.

Abstract

To assess the opinion and the level of satisfaction of patients concerning analgesia during external cephalic version (ECV), we present the results of a survey of 120 women undergoing ECV at term during a randomised controlled trial (July 2012 to February 2013) comparing remifentanil and nitrous oxide. Overall, 110 (91.7%) women said they would repeat the procedure and 111 (92.5%) that they would recommend it to another pregnant woman, with no significant differences by type of analgesia. The administration and sense of comfort were rated better in the remifentanil group ( < .01). In conclusion, the use of analgesia during ECV is associated with a high rate of willingness among women to repeat the procedure and recommend it to other pregnant women.Impact statement ECV is commonly a painful manoeuvre for the woman. This pain triggers maternal reactive abdominal muscle contraction and involuntary abdominal tensing, reducing the likelihood of successful version and causing some women to reject the technique. The use of analgesia during ECV is associated with a high rate of willingness among women to repeat the procedure and recommend it to other pregnant women. The sense of comfort during ECV was also significantly better in the remifentanil group, probably because of its greater analgesic power and greater comfort during its administration. ECV should be carried out under analgesia, when available, not only to decrease pain but also to encourage wider adoption of the technique and enable more women to benefit from it.