Browse by Audience
MEMBER

Update Your Profile
Special Interest Groups (SIG)
Member Spotlights
IASP Connect
Join Now

RESEARCHER

PAIN
PAIN Reports
Pain Research Forum
Pain Researcher
Events

HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Online Learning - PERC
Curricula
Graduate Opportunities
Treatment and Education Resources
Events

PATIENT & CAREGIVER

Resources for Living with Pain
Topic Pages
Free Videos
Events

PARTNER

Support IASP
Sponsor an Event
Become a Partner
Make a Donation

I am a
IASP Logo
Home I AM A Search Login

Papers of the Week

Home / Publications / Pain Research Forum / Papers of the Week / A Cost-Consequence Analysis Examining the Differences Between Non-Rechargeable and Rechargeable Systems.

< BACK TO ARCHIVE


2020 Feb


Anesth Pain Med


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337173?dopt=Abstract


10


1

A Cost-Consequence Analysis Examining the Differences Between Non-Rechargeable and Rechargeable Systems.

Authors

A Cost-Consequence Analysis Examining the Differences Between Non-Rechargeable and Rechargeable Systems.
Abejón D, Vancamp T, Monzón EM
Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Feb; 10(1):e100308.
PMID: 32337173.

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment option to relieve chronic intractable pain, and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a key indication.
Read This Paper