I am a
Home I AM A Search Login
FACT SHEETS

Genetic Biomarkers of Pain States

Published

18 January 2022

GLOBAL YEAR

This year’s theme focuses on increasing the awareness of clinicians, scientists, and the public of our growing pain knowledge and how it can benefit those living with pain.

Learn More >

The FDA Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools (BEST) glossary of biomarker terms identifies a biomarker as a “defined characteristic that is measured as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or biological responses to an exposure or intervention, including therapeutic interventions”. Given the reported heritability for pain states of 16–50% (1,2), a substantial proportion of the risk of developing a chronic pain condition is driven by genetic background. For pain states, no robust genetic markers have been identified so far. However, multiple efforts of the pain research field have identified many genetic markers associated with several categories of pain states: 

Genetic Markers for Rare Familial Disorders: In the case of specific rare familial single-gene disorders, genetic mutations can be strongly predictive for pain states. For example, mutations in the gene coding for sodium channel Nav1.7 produce either loss or gain of the function of the channel, leading to either inability to feel pain (3), or to enhanced pain sensitivity and spontaneous burning pain (4), respectively. Another example of the inability to feel pain due to a single-gene pain disorder is a disruptive mutation in the NTRK1 gene (5), which encodes neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 1, and NGF (6), which encodes nerve growth factor beta, the binding partner of NTRK1. Although there are dozens of gene mutations identified today, severe mutations in which can either exacerbate pain or annul it, the prevalence of such familial disorders is extremely low. However, they have given great insight into the neurobiology of pain and therapeutic targets (7).

Genetic Markers for Common Diseases: In the case of common neuropathic, postoperative, and musculoskeletal pain disorders, each single genetic variant plays only a modest role, as such conditions are multifactorial and polygenic in nature, and a large network of pain genes (8) is important. These genetic variants are usually relatively common in the general population. Some of these polymorphic variants are found more often to be associated with chronic pain states and sometimes with multiple pain states, which have been shown to share genetic factors (9). Two examples of such polymorphic variants frequently implicated in chronic pain states are those in the mu-opioid receptor gene, OPRM1, and the gene coding for the non-selective cation channel, TRPV1. For example, cancer pain has been shown to be associated with genetic variability in OPRM1 (10–12), which modulates opioid receptor’s pharmacodynamics, affecting the efficacy of both endogenous opioids and analgesic opioid drugs. TRPV1 is involved in the transmission and modulation of inflammatory pain (13–15). Studies have shown evidence of increased TRPV1 levels in the environment of damaged nerve fibers and associated dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Polymorphisms in TRPV1 are associated with pain states, for example, a variant rs8065080 (1911A>G) is associated with less capsaicin-induced warm hypoesthesia and heat pain sensitivity in healthy volunteers suggesting altered channel function (16). 

Identification of new drug targets from genetic data:  The identification of genetic variants contributing to chronic pain also leads to an understanding of the pathophysiology of human chronic pain states directly from the patients. This knowledge can ultimately be used to identify new approaches and drug targets to treat chronic pain. For example, the identification of the causal mutations in sodium channel Nav1.7 to familial pain disorders led to substantial efforts in the development of sodium channel blockers selective for this receptor subtype (17).  The discovery of the critical contribution of the genetic polymorphisms within the human catechol O-methyltransferase COMT gene to pain perception and chronic pain through multiple genetic studies (18) led to new pharmacological approaches for chronic pain conditions through animal studies (19,20) and follow on clinical trials (21,22). These studies showed that propranolol, a nonselective β-adrenergic antagonist, which is widely used clinically for the treatment of hypertension and anxiety, is also clinically effective as a treatment for chronic facial pain.

Pharmacogenetics markers of drug efficacy: The genetic basis of the variability in therapeutic responses to various analgesics can be very substantial. In the pain field, the best example is probably the effect of polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) on the analgesic efficacy and safety of codeine. Codeine prodrug, which is metabolized by P4502D6 to morphine, has a little therapeutic effect in patients who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, and have one or no copies of CYP2D6 gene, whereas the risk of morphine toxicity is higher in ultrarapid metabolizers, who possess multiple copies of this gene in their genome (20). Another example is the association of A118G polymorphism in opioid receptor OPRM1 with opioid requirements in postoperative (23) and cancer patients (24). The meta-analyses show that carriers of the G-allele (AG+GG) of the OPRM1 A118G polymorphism reliably require higher opioid doses for pain management than those carrying the AA, although the dose difference is not large. 

Pharmacogenetics markers of medication adverse effects:  One of the most important pharmacogenetic findings for the adverse effects of analgesics is the discovery of the association between the genetic markers of human leukocyte antigens (HLA allele), HLA-B*15:02, and drug-induced severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs), namely Stevens–Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), from carbamazepine (25) and oxcarbazepine (26). Both drugs are recommended as first-line medications for certain neuropathic pain conditions such as trigeminal neuralgia. Moreover, the HLA-B*15:02 allele is the strongest genetic marker for the prediction of SJS/TEN induced by carbamazepine in some specific East and Southeast Asian ethnic groups due to high frequency of this allele found among these populations (27). Therefore, the US FDA issued a warning in 2007, which is still in effect today, for screening for HLA-B*15:02 allele prior to treatment of carbamazepine in all Asians and Asian ancestry patients (27).  Moreover, a moderate association has been found between HLA-A*31:01 and the risk of developing SCARS to carbamazepine in the Japanese, Korean and northern European populations (28–30), demonstrating the usefulness of biomarkers to prevent adverse drug reactions in patients with specific ethnicity or ancestry.

REFERENCES

  1. Hocking LJ, Generation Scotland, Morris AD, Dominiczak AF, Porteous DJ, Smith BH. Heritability of chronic pain in 2195 extended families. Eur J Pain 2012;16(7):1053–63. 
  2. Nielsen C, Knudsen G, Steingrímsdóttir Ó. Twin studies of pain. Clin Genet 2012;82(4):331–40. 
  3. Yang Y, Mis MA, Estacion M, Dib-Hajj SD, Waxman SG. NaV1.7 as a Pharmacogenomic Target for Pain: Moving Toward Precision Medicine. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2018;39(3):258–75. 
  4. Dib-Hajj SD, Waxman SG. Sodium Channels in Human Pain Disorders: Genetics and Pharmacogenomics. Annu Rev Neurosci 2019;42(1):87–106. 
  5. Miura Y, Mardy S, Awaya Y, Nihei K, Endo F, Matsuda I, et al. Mutation and polymorphism analysis of the TRKA (NTRK1) gene encoding a high-affinity receptor for nerve growth factor in congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis (CIPA) families. Hum Genet 2000;106(1):116–24. 
  6. Einarsdottir E, Carlsson A, Minde J, Toolanen G, Svensson O, Solders G, et al. A mutation in the nerve growth factor beta gene (NGFB) causes loss of pain perception. Hum Mol Genet 2004;13(8):799–805. 
  7. Zorina-Lichtenwalter K, Parisien M, Diatchenko L. Genetic studies of human neuropathic pain conditions: a review. Pain 2018;159(3):583–94. 
  8. Meloto CB, Benavides R, Lichtenwalter RN, Wen X, Tugarinov N, Zorina-Lichtenwalter K, et al. Human pain genetics database: a resource dedicated to human pain genetics research. Pain 2018;159(4):749–63. 
  9. Vehof J, Zavos HMS, Lachance G, Hammond CJ, Williams FMK. Shared genetic factors underlie chronic pain syndromes. Pain 2014;155(8):1562–8. 
  10. De Gregori M, Diatchenko L, Belfer I, Allegri M. OPRM1 receptor as new biomarker to help the prediction of post mastectomy pain and recurrence in breast cancer. Minerva Anestesiol 2015;81(8):894–900. 
  11. Hasvik E, Iordanova Schistad E, Grøvle L, Julsrud Haugen A, Røe C, Gjerstad J. Subjective health complaints in patients with lumbar radicular pain and disc herniation are associated with a sex – OPRM1 A118G polymorphism interaction: a prospective 1-year observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:161. 
  12. Cheng K-I, Lin S-R, Chang L-L, Wang J-Y, Lai C-S. Association of the functional A118G polymorphism of OPRM1 in diabetic patients with foot ulcer pain. J Diabetes Complications 2010;24(2):102–8. 
  13. Dai Y. TRPs and pain. Semin Immunopathol 2016;38(3):277–91. 
  14. Madasu MK, Okine BN, Olango WM, Rea K, Lenihan R, Roche M, et al. Genotype-dependent responsivity to inflammatory pain: A role for TRPV1 in the periaqueductal grey. Pharmacol Res 2016;113(Pt A):44–54. 
  15. Valdes AM, De Wilde G, Doherty SA, Lories RJ, Vaughn FL, Laslett LL, et al. The Ile585Val TRPV1 variant is involved in risk of painful knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70(9):1556–61. 
  16. Forstenpointner J, Förster M, May D, Hofschulte F, Cascorbi I, Wasner G, et al. Short Report: TRPV1-polymorphism 1911 A>G alters capsaicin-induced sensory changes in healthy subjects. PloS One 2017;12(8):e0183322. 
  17. Alsaloum M, Higerd GP, Effraim PR, Waxman SG. Status of peripheral sodium channel blockers for non-addictive pain treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 2020;16(12):689–705. 
  18. Diatchenko L, Slade GD, Nackley AG, Bhalang K, Sigurdsson A, Belfer I, et al. Genetic basis for individual variations in pain perception and the development of a chronic pain condition. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14(1):135–43. 
  19. Tchivileva IE, Lim PF, Smith SB, Slade GD, Diatchenko L, McLean SA, et al. Effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism on response to propranolol therapy in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2010;20(4):239–48. 
  20. Crews KR, Gaedigk A, Dunnenberger HM, Klein TE, Shen DD, Callaghan JT, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for codeine therapy in the context of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;91(2):321–6. 
  21. Tchivileva IE, Hadgraft H, Lim PF, Di Giosia M, Ribeiro-Dasilva M, Campbell JH, et al. Efficacy and safety of propranolol for treatment of temporomandibular disorder pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Pain 2020;161(8):1755–67. 
  22. Tchivileva IE, Ohrbach R, Fillingim RB, Lim PF, Giosia MD, Ribeiro-Dasilva M, et al. Effect of comorbid migraine on propranolol efficacy for painful TMD in a randomized controlled trial. Cephalalgia Int J Headache 2021;41(7):839–50. 
  23. Hwang IC, Park J-Y, Myung S-K, Ahn HY, Fukuda K, Liao Q. OPRM1 A118G gene variant and postoperative opioid requirement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2014;121(4):825–34. 
  24. Yu Z, Wen L, Shen X, Zhang H. Effects of the OPRM1 A118G Polymorphism (rs1799971) on Opioid Analgesia in Cancer Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin J Pain 2019;35(1):77–86. 
  25. Chung W-H, Hung S-I, Hong H-S, Hsih M-S, Yang L-C, Ho H-C, et al. Medical genetics: a marker for Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Nature 2004;428(6982):486. 
  26. Chen C-B, Hsiao Y-H, Wu T, Hsih M-S, Tassaneeyakul W, Jorns TP, et al. Risk and association of HLA with oxcarbazepine-induced cutaneous adverse reactions in Asians. Neurology 2017;88(1):78–86. 
  27. Ferrell PB, McLeod HL. Carbamazepine, HLA-B*1502 and risk of Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: US FDA recommendations. Pharmacogenomics 2008;9(10):1543–6. 
  28. Ozeki T, Mushiroda T, Yowang A, Takahashi A, Kubo M, Shirakata Y, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies HLA-A*3101 allele as a genetic risk factor for carbamazepine-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions in Japanese population. Hum Mol Genet 2011;20(5):1034–41. 
  29. Kim S-H, Lee KW, Song W-J, Kim S-H, Jee Y-K, Lee S-M, et al. Carbamazepine-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions and HLA genotypes in Koreans. Epilepsy Res 2011;97(1–2):190–7. 
  30. McCormack M, Alfirevic A, Bourgeois S, Farrell JJ, Kasperavičiūtė D, Carrington M, et al. HLA-A3101 and Carbamazepine-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions in Europeans. N Engl J Med 2011;364(12):1134–43. 

SUGGESTED REVIEWERS:

Jefferey Mogil
McGill University
Department of Psychology
1205 Dr Penfield Avenue
Montreal, QC
H3A 1B1
jeffrey.mogil@mcgill.ca

Sulayman D. Dib-Hajj
Yale University School of Medicine
New Haven, Connecticut 06510
sulayman.dib-hajj@yale.edu

David L. Bennett
Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience
University of Oxford
Oxford, UK
david.bennett@ndcn.ox.ac.uk

Maxim Freydin
King’s college
Westminster Bridge Road
London, UK, SE1 7EH
maxim.freydin@kcl.ac.uk

Francis Williams
King’s college
Room : Block D, Floor 3, South Wing
Westminster Bridge Road
London, SE1 7EH
frances.williams@kcl.ac.uk

Share this