Browse by Audience
MEMBER

Update Your Profile
Special Interest Groups (SIG)
Member Spotlights
IASP Connect
Join Now

RESEARCHER

PAIN
PAIN Reports
Pain Research Forum
Pain Researcher
Events

HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Online Learning - PERC
Curricula
Graduate Opportunities
Treatment and Education Resources
Events

PATIENT & CAREGIVER

Resources for Living with Pain
Topic Pages
Free Videos
Events

PARTNER

Support IASP
Sponsor an Event
Become a Partner
Make a Donation

I am a
IASP Logo
Home I AM A Search Login

Papers of the Week

Home / Publications / Pain Research Forum / Papers of the Week / Issues in design, conduct, and conclusions of JAMA’s Hara et al.’s randomized clinical trial of spinal cord burst stimulation versus placebo stimulation on disability in patients with chronic radicular pain after lumbar spine surgery.

< BACK TO ARCHIVE


Papers: 10 Dec 2022 - 16 Dec 2022


2022 Dec 11


Pain Pract


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36504290?dopt=Abstract

Issues in design, conduct, and conclusions of JAMA’s Hara et al.’s randomized clinical trial of spinal cord burst stimulation versus placebo stimulation on disability in patients with chronic radicular pain after lumbar spine surgery.

Authors

Issues in design, conduct, and conclusions of JAMA's Hara et al.'s randomized clinical trial of spinal cord burst stimulation versus placebo stimulation on disability in patients with chronic radicular pain after lumbar spine surgery.
Eldabe S, Gilligan C, Taylor RS, Patel KV, Duarte RV
Pain Pract. 2022 Dec 11.
PMID: 36504290.
Read This Paper