Browse by Audience
MEMBER

Update Your Profile
Member Spotlights
Refer a Member: IASP Champions
Join a Special Interest Group (SIG)
Find a Chapter
Join Now

RESEARCHER

PAIN
PAIN Reports
Pain Research Forum
Papers of the Week
Webinars and Podcasts
Events

HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Online Learning - PERC
Webinars & Podcasts
Curricula
Graduate Opportunities
Events

PATIENT & CAREGIVER

RELIEF News
Resources for Living with Pain
Global Alliance of Partners in Pain Advocacy (GAPPA)
Events

PARTNER

Support IASP
Sponsor an Event
Become a Partner

gy2022-1-3
I am a
IASP Logo
Home I AM A Search Login

Papers of the Week

Home / Publications / Pain Research Forum / Papers of the Week / Double-Puncture Versus Single-Puncture Arthrocentesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 3 Years of Follow-Up.

< BACK TO ARCHIVE


2022 Spring


J Oral Facial Pain Headache


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943324?dopt=Abstract


36


2

Double-Puncture Versus Single-Puncture Arthrocentesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 3 Years of Follow-Up.

Authors

Double-Puncture Versus Single-Puncture Arthrocentesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 3 Years of Follow-Up.
Grossmann E, Poluha R L
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2022 Spring; 36(2):141-146.
PMID: 35943324.

Abstract

To compare the clinical effectiveness of conventional double-puncture vs single-puncture type 2 arthrocentesis for management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR) after 3 years of follow-up.
Read This Paper