Browse by Audience
MEMBER

Update Your Profile
Special Interest Groups (SIG)
Member Spotlights
IASP Connect
Join Now

RESEARCHER

PAIN
PAIN Reports
Pain Research Forum
Pain Researcher
Events

HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Online Learning - PERC
Curricula
Graduate Opportunities
Treatment and Education Resources
Events

PATIENT & CAREGIVER

Resources for Living with Pain
Topic Pages
Free Videos
Events

PARTNER

Support IASP
Sponsor an Event
Become a Partner
Make a Donation

I am a
IASP Logo
Home I AM A Search Login

Papers of the Week

Home / Publications / Pain Research Forum / Papers of the Week / Uterine externalization versus in situ repair of hysterotomy during cesarean delivery: a systematic review, equivalence meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

< BACK TO ARCHIVE


2022 Feb 17


Int J Obstet Anesth


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35299027?dopt=Abstract


50

Uterine externalization versus in situ repair of hysterotomy during cesarean delivery: a systematic review, equivalence meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

Authors

Uterine externalization versus in situ repair of hysterotomy during cesarean delivery: a systematic review, equivalence meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.
Bhat A, Jaffer D, Keasler P, Kamath K, Kelly J, Singh PM
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022 Feb 17; 50:103271.
PMID: 35299027.

Abstract

Uterine positioning during hysterotomy repair is controversial, with both in situ and externalized approaches commonly performed. Despite many published trials, clinical equipoise remains. This meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) summarizes studies comparing both techniques.
Read This Paper