Browse by Audience
MEMBER

Update Your Profile
Member Spotlights
Refer a Member: IASP Champions
Join a Special Interest Group (SIG)
Find a Chapter
Join Now

RESEARCHER

PAIN
PAIN Reports
Pain Research Forum
Papers of the Week
Webinars and Podcasts
Events

HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Online Learning - PERC
Webinars & Podcasts
Curricula
Graduate Opportunities
Events

PATIENT & CAREGIVER

RELIEF News
Resources for Living with Pain
Global Alliance of Partners in Pain Advocacy (GAPPA)
Events

PARTNER

Support IASP
Sponsor an Event
Become a Partner

gy2022-1-3
I am a
IASP Logo
Home I AM A Search Login

Papers of the Week

Home / Publications / Pain Research Forum / Papers of the Week / Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dinalbuphine Sebacate, Patient-Controlled Analgesia, and Conventional Analgesia After Laparotomy for Gynecologic Cancers: A Retrospective Study.

< BACK TO ARCHIVE


2021


J Pain Res


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34163233?dopt=Abstract


14

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dinalbuphine Sebacate, Patient-Controlled Analgesia, and Conventional Analgesia After Laparotomy for Gynecologic Cancers: A Retrospective Study.

Authors

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dinalbuphine Sebacate, Patient-Controlled Analgesia, and Conventional Analgesia After Laparotomy for Gynecologic Cancers: A Retrospective Study.
Chang S-H, Chang T-C, Chen M-Y, Chen W-C, Chou H-H
J Pain Res. 2021; 14:1763-1771.
PMID: 34163233.

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the effects of dinalbuphine sebacate (DNS), fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and conventional analgesia (CA) for pain management after laparotomy for gynecologic cancers.
Read This Paper