Browse by Audience
MEMBER

Update Your Profile
Special Interest Groups (SIG)
Member Spotlights
IASP Connect
Join Now

RESEARCHER

PAIN
PAIN Reports
Pain Research Forum
Pain Researcher
Events

HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Online Learning - PERC
Curricula
Graduate Opportunities
Treatment and Education Resources
Events

PATIENT & CAREGIVER

Resources for Living with Pain
Topic Pages
Free Videos
Events

PARTNER

Support IASP
Sponsor an Event
Become a Partner
Make a Donation

I am a
IASP Logo
Home I AM A Search Login

Papers of the Week

Home / Publications / Pain Research Forum / Papers of the Week / Reliability and Validity of the Korean Language Version of the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

< BACK TO ARCHIVE


2020 Feb 07


J Pain Symptom Manage


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32044423?dopt=Abstract

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Language Version of the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

Authors

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Language Version of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Yoon J, Sim S H, Kang D, Han G, Kim Y, Ahn J S, Oh D, Lee E, Kong S Y, Cho J, Mitchell SA
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Feb 07.
PMID: 32044423.

Abstract

To improve precision and accuracy in the capture of symptomatic adverse events by self-report, the US National Cancer Institute has developed a library of 124 patient-reported outcome (PRO) items reflecting 78 symptomatic AEs drawn from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The PRO-CTCAE™ item library has been translated and linguistically validated in the Korean language. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of PRO-CTCAE-Korean.
Read This Paper