I am a
Home I AM A Search Login

Pharmacology/Drug Development

Share this

Why are we still using opioids for osteoarthritis?

Osteoarthritis is a common debilitating condition affecting a substantial portion of the population and is an accepted consequence of aging and over use. Whilst surgical interventions are a definitive approach, most cases are managed medically with analgesia. Pharmacological therapies have included acetaminophen, NSAIDs and opiates. Although significant controversies exist in the use of opioids for chronic musculoskeletal pain, many leading guidelines continue to recommend its use despite increasing evidence to suggest an increase in addiction, morbidity and mortality. With the opiate crisis growing, we re-examine the role opiates have in this chronic condition, current data and briefly evaluate alternative therapies.

Learn More >

Angiotensin receptor blockade mimics the effect of exercise on recovery after orthopaedic trauma by decreasing pain and improving muscle regeneration.

Our tibial fracture orthopaedic injury model in mice recapitulates the major manifestations of complex trauma including nociceptive sensitization, bone fracture, muscle fibrosis and muscle fibre loss. Delayed exercise after complex orthopaedic trauma results in decreased muscle fibrosis and improved pain Losartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker with antifibrotic abilities, recapitulates the effect of exercise on post-injury recovery and may provide an enhanced recovery option for those who are unable to exercise after injury ABSTRACT: Chronic pain and disability after limb injury are major public health problems. Early mobilization after injury improves functional outcomes for patients but when and how to implement rehabilitation strategies remains a clinical challenge. Additionally, whether the beneficial effects of exercise can be reproduced using pharmacological tools remains unknown and may benefit patients who are unable to exercise due to immobilization. We developed a murine model of orthopaedic trauma combining tibia fracture and pin fixation with muscle damage. Behavioral measures included mechanical nociceptive thresholds and distances run on exercise wheels. Bone healing was quantified using microCT scanning, and muscle fibre size distribution and fibrosis were followed using immunohistochemistry. We found that the model provided robust mechanical allodynia, fibrosis and a shift to smaller average muscle fibre size lasting up to 5 weeks from injury. We also observed that allowing "late" (weeks 1-2) rather than "early" (weeks 0-1) exercise after injury resulted in greater overall running activity and greater reversal of allodynia. In parallel, the late running paradigm was associated with reduced muscle fibrosis, earlier increase in muscle fibre diameter and a short-term benefit in reducing callus volume. Providing the anti-fibrotic angiotensin receptor blocker losartan to mice in drinking water reduced both allodynia and muscle fibrosis. Combining losartan and late exercise provided no additional benefit. We conclude that early healing after orthopaedic trauma must be allowed prior to the initiation of exercise to achieve optimal pain, functional and physiological outcomes and that losartan is a viable candidate for translational studies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Learn More >

Practice Advisory on the Appropriate Use of NSAIDs in Primary Care.

Cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 selective and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are important in managing acute and chronic pain secondary to inflammation. As a greater understanding of the risks of gastrointestinal (GI), cardiovascular (CV) and renal events with NSAIDs use has emerged, guidelines have evolved to reflect differences in risks among NSAIDs. Updated guidelines have yet to reflect new evidence from recent trials which showed similar CV event rates with celecoxib compared to naproxen and ibuprofen, and significantly better GI tolerability for celecoxib. This practice advisory paper aims to present consensus statements and associated guidance regarding appropriate NSAID use based on a review of current evidence by a multidisciplinary group of expert clinicians. This paper is especially intended to guide primary care practitioners within Asia in the appropriate use of NSAIDs in primary care. Following a literature review, group members used a modified Delphi consensus process to determine agreement with selected recommendations. Agreement with a statement by 75% of total voting members was defined a priori as consensus. For low GI risk patients, any nonselective NSAID plus proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or celecoxib alone is acceptable treatment when CV risk is low; for high CV risk patients, low-dose celecoxib or naproxen plus PPI is appropriate. For high GI risk patients, celecoxib plus PPI is acceptable for low CV risk patients; low-dose celecoxib plus PPI is appropriate for high CV risk patients, with the alternative to avoid NSAIDs and consider opioids instead. Appropriate NSAID prescription assumes that the patient has normal renal function at commencement, with ongoing monitoring recommended. In conclusion, appropriate NSAID use requires consideration of all risks.

Learn More >

The Interaction Between Spinal PDGFRβ and μ Opioid Receptor in the Activation of Microglia in Morphine-Tolerant Rats.

Opioid tolerance remains a challenging problem, which limits prolonged drug usage in clinics. Previous studies have shown a fundamental role of platelet-derived growth factor receptor β submit (PDGFRβ) in morphine tolerance. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanisms of spinal PDGFRβ activation in morphine tolerance.

Learn More >

The Efficacy and Safety of Topiramate in the Prevention of Pediatric Migraine: An Update Meta-Analysis.

Migraine is the most common acute primary headache in children and adolescents. In 2014, topiramate became the first preventive drug for migraine, approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adolescents. This meta-analysis was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate in the prevention of pediatric migraine. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases up to June 2019 for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes were mean migraine days per month, ≥50% reduction rate, and Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (PedMIDAS) scores. RevMan5.3 software was performed for statistical analysis. Overall, 5 RCTs recruiting 531 patients (6-17 years of age) were included in the meta-analysis. The target dose of topiramate was 2 mg/kg (the maintenance phase was 12 weeks), 2-3 mg/kg, 50 mg/day, and 100 mg/day (maintaining for 16 weeks), respectively, in the included studies. Our results demonstrate that participants receiving topiramate had a significant advantage in remitting the monthly migraine days than those receiving placebo, with a mean difference (MD) of -0.78 ( = 531; 95% CI, -1.23 to -0.32; = 3.37; = 0.0008). Topiramate could also reduce the mean PedMIDAS scores ( = 238; 95% CI, -16.53 to -0.49; = 2.43; = 0.04). However, there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction in monthly headache days between topiramate and placebo groups ( = 531; 95% CI, 0.94-1.77; = 1.58; = 0.11). Topiramate was associated with higher rates of side effects such as weight decrease ( = 395; 95% CI, 2.73-22.98; = 3.81; < 0.01) and paresthesia ( = 531; 95% CI, 3.05-13.18; = 4.94; < 0.01). Topiramate can significantly decrease monthly headache days and migraine-related burden in migraine patients <18 years old. However, it failed to increase 50% response rate. Adverse events seem to be more frequent in topiramate-treated children.

Learn More >

Sexually dimorphic therapeutic response in bortezomib-induced neuropathic pain reveals altered pain physiology in female rodents.

Chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (CINP) in both sexes compromises many current chemotherapeutics and lacks a FDA-approved therapy. We recently identified the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtype 1 (S1PR1) and A3 adenosine receptor subtype (A3AR) as novel targets for therapeutic intervention. Our work in male rodents using paclitaxel, oxaliplatin and bortezomib showed robust inhibition of CINP with either S1PR1 antagonists or A3AR agonists. The S1PR1 functional antagonist FTY720 (Gilenya®) is FDA approved for treating multiple sclerosis and selective A3AR agonists are in advanced clinical trials for cancer and inflammatory disorders, underscoring the need for their expedited trials in CINP patients as chemotherapy adjuncts. Our findings reveal that S1PR1 antagonists and A3AR agonists mitigate paclitaxel and oxaliplatin CINP in female and male rodents, but failed to block or reverse bortezomib-induced neuropathic pain (BINP) in females. Although numerous mechanisms likely underlie these differences, we focused on receptor levels. We found that BINP in male rats, but not female rats, was associated with increased expression of A3AR in spinal cord dorsal horn, while S1PR1 levels were similar in both sexes. Thus, alternative mechanisms beyond receptor expression may account for sex differences in response to S1PR1 antagonists. Morphine and duloxetine, both clinical analgesics, reversed BINP in female mice, demonstrating that the lack of response is specific to S1PR1 and A3AR agents. Our findings suggest that A3AR- and S1PR1-based therapies are not viable approaches in preventing and treating BINP in females and should inform future clinical trials of these drugs as adjuncts to chemotherapy. SUMMARY:: We have found that there are sexually dimorphic responses to S1PR1 antagonists and A3AR agonists for the treatment of bortezomib-induced neuropathic pain.

Learn More >

Angiotensin Type 2 Receptors: Painful, or Not?

Pain in response to various types of acute injury can be a protective stimulus to prevent the organism from using the injured part and allow tissue repair and healing. On the other hand, neuropathic pain, defined as 'pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system', is a debilitating pathology. The TRPA1 neurons in the Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) respond to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and induce pain. In acute nerve injury and inflammation, macrophages infiltrating the site of injury undergo an oxidative burst, and generate ROS that promote tissue repair and induce pain via TRPA1. The latter discourages using the injured limb, with a lack of movement helping wound healing. In chronic inflammation caused by diabetes, cancer etc., ROS levels increase systemically and modulate TRPA1 neuronal functions and cause debilitating neuropathic pain. It is important to distinguish between drug targets that elicit protective vs. debilitating pain when developing effective drugs for neuropathic pain. In this context, the connection of the Angiotensin type 2 receptor (ATR) to neuropathic pain presents an interesting dilemma. Several lines of evidence show that ATR activation promotes anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive signaling, tissue repair, and suppresses ROS in chronic inflammatory models. Conversely, some studies suggest that ATR antagonists are anti-nociceptive and therefore ATR is a drug target for neuropathic pain. However, ATR expression in nociceptive neurons is lacking, indicating that neuronal ATR is not involved in neuropathic pain. It is also important to consider that Novartis terminated their phase II clinical trial (EMPHENE) to validate that ATR antagonist EMA401 mitigates post-herpetic neuralgia. This trial, conducted in Australia, United Kingdom, and a number of European and Asian countries in 2019, was discontinued due to pre-clinical drug toxicity data. Moreover, early data from the trial did not show statistically significant positive outcomes. These facts suggest that may ATR not be the proper drug target for neuropathic pain in humans and its inhibition can be harmful.

Learn More >

Intravenous Administration of Pyroglutamyl Apelin-13 Alleviates Murine Inflammatory Pain via the Kappa Opioid Receptor.

Apelin is an endogenous neuropeptide, which has wide distribution in central nervous system and peripheral tissues. Pyroglutamyl apelin-13 [(pyr)apelin-13] is the major apelin isoform in human plasma. However, the role of peripheral (pyr)apelin-13 in pain regulation is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the peripheral injection of (pyr)apelin-13 on inflammatory pain using the formalin test as well as to evaluate the mechanistic basis for the effect. Results showed intravenous (i.v.) injection of (pyr)apelin-13 (10, 20 mg/kg) to significantly decrease licking/biting time during the second phase of the mouse formalin test. In contrast, i.v. injection of apelin-13 had no influence on such effect. Intramuscular injection of (pyr)apelin-13 reduced licking/biting time during the second phase only at a dose of 20 mg/kg. The antinociception of i.v. (pyr)apelin-13 was antagonized by the apelin receptor (APJ, angiotensin II receptor-like 1) antagonist, apelin-13(F13A). (pyr)apelin-13 (i.v. 20 mg/kg) markedly upregulated and gene expression in the prefrontal cortex, whereas gene expression was downregulated. The antinociception of i.v. (pyr)apelin-13 was blocked by the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone and the specific kappa opioid receptor (KOR) antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI). (pyr)Apelin-13 upregulated the dynorphin and KOR gene expression and protein levels in the mouse prefrontal cortex, not in striatum. (pyr)Apelin-13 did not influence the motor behavior. Our results demonstrate that i.v. injection of (pyr)apelin-13 induces antinociception via the KOR in the inflammatory pain mouse model.

Learn More >

Cannabis Extract CT-921 Has a High Efficacy-Adverse Effect Profile in a Neuropathic Pain Model.

Legalization of cannabis encourages the development of specific cultivars to treat disease such as neuropathic pain. Because of the large number of cultivars, it is necessary to prioritize extracts before proceeding to clinical trials.

Learn More >

Design of Phase 3 Studies Evaluating Vixotrigine for Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Vixotrigine (BIIB074) is a voltage- and use-dependent sodium channel blocker. These studies will evaluate the efficacy and safety of vixotrigine in treating pain experienced by patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) using enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial designs.

Learn More >

Search