Psychology

To determine the short-term effect of graded motor imagery (GMI) on the affective components of pain and range of motion in subjects with chronic shoulder pain syndrome.

Non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a multifactorial disorder. Pain-related fear and altered movement preparation are considered to be key factors in the chronification process. Interactions between both have been hypothesized, but studies examining the influence of situational fear on movement preparation in low back pain (LBP) are wanting, as well as studies differentiating between recurrent LBP (RLBP) and CLBP. Therefore, this study examined whether experimentally induced pain-related fear influences movement preparation. In healthy controls (n=32), RLBP (n=31) and CLBP (n=30) patients central and peripheral measures of movement preparation were assessed by concurrently measuring trunk muscle anticipatory postural adjustments (APA) with EMG and Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) with EEG during performance of rapid arm movements (RAM). Two conditions were compared, one without (no fear) and one with (fear) possibility of painful stimulation to the back during RAM. Visual analogue scales were used to assess pain-related expectations/fear in both conditions. The experimentally induced fear of pain during movement performance led to an increase in CNV-amplitude, which was similar in all three groups. Concerning APAs no effects of fear were found, but group differences with generally delayed APAs in CLBP compared to controls and RLBP patients were evident. These results suggest that with fear an attentional redirection towards more conscious central movement preparation strategies occurs. Furthermore, differences in movement preparation in RLBP and CLBP patients exist, which could explain why RLBP patients have more recovery capabilities than CLBP.

To describe the protocol of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and mechanisms of three behavioral interventions.

Fear of pain demonstrates significant prognostic value regarding the development of persistent musculoskeletal pain and disability. Its assessment often relies on self-report measures of pain-related fear by a variety of questionnaires. However, based either on "fear of movement/(re)injury/kinesiophobia," "fear avoidance beliefs," or "pain anxiety," pain-related fear constructs plausibly differ while it is unclear how specific the questionnaires are in assessing these different constructs. Furthermore, the relationship of pain-related fear to other anxiety measures such as state or trait anxiety remains ambiguous. Advances in neuroimaging such as machine learning on brain activity patterns recorded by functional magnetic resonance imaging might help to dissect commonalities or differences across pain-related fear constructs. We applied a pattern regression approach in 20 human patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain to reveal predictive relationships between fear-related neural pattern information and different pain-related fear questionnaires. More specifically, the applied multiple kernel learning approach allowed the generation of models to predict the questionnaire scores based on a hierarchical ranking of fear-related neural patterns induced by viewing videos of activities potentially harmful for the back. We sought to find evidence for or against overlapping pain-related fear constructs by comparing the questionnaire prediction models according to their predictive abilities and associated neural contributors. By demonstrating evidence of nonoverlapping neural predictors within fear-processing regions, the results underpin the diversity of pain-related fear constructs. This neuroscientific approach might ultimately help to further understand and dissect psychological pain-related fear constructs.

This study examined whether a modified version of biofeedback (ie, Conditioned Biofeedback) that incorporated placebo analgesia-like manipulations could promote anti-nociception in healthy, pain-free participants. During Conditioned Biofeedback (n=28), sympathetic arousal level was displayed visually and participants were asked to reduce it while they received painful electric stimulations that were surreptitiously controlled by their arousal level. Thus, electric pain decreased as arousal decreased to associate successful arousal-reduction/relaxation with pain relief, and to promote expectations for future pain relief. A Biofeedback Only group (n=24) controlled for the general effects of biofeedback/relaxation. A Biofeedback+Shock group (n=21) controlled for the effects of practicing biofeedback during painful shocks. Nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) threshold and temporal summation of pain (TS-pain) were used to assess changes in spinal nociception and pain facilitation, respectively. Results indicated all groups showed pre- to post-biofeedback increases in NFR threshold, but only the Conditioned Biofeedback group showed pre- to post-biofeedback reductions in TS-pain. Moreover, Conditioned Biofeedback resulted in a persistent (pre-biofeedback) increase in NFR threshold across sessions, whereas Biofeedback Only resulted in a persistent (pre-biofeedback) decrease in TS-pain. In sum, Conditioned Biofeedback may promote anti-nociception in healthy participants thus reducing risk for chronic pain. The study was registered prospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov (TU1560). PERSPECTIVE: A modified version of biofeedback that employs placebo analgesia manipulations was successful in increasing descending inhibition and reducing pain facilitation in healthy volunteers. As a result, it may be an effective means of reducing risk of future chronic pain onset by promoting an anti-nociceptive pain profile.