Resource

Patients within the safety net, defined as gap healthcare services for un- or under-insured persons, disproportionately suffer high impact chronic pain. The purpose of this review was to examine pain-related outcomes from multidisciplinary programs for patients with chronic pain within the safety net. A scoping review was conducted based on the Arksey and O'Malley framework coupled with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses-Scoping Review checklist. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched for eligible articles published between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2020. Grey literature was searched by typing relevant keywords into Google. Quantitative and qualitative outcomes were included. Data collected were charted and analyzed. Ten articles were included, with five demonstrating primarily quantitative results, three demonstrating primarily qualitative results, and the remaining two demonstrating primarily mixed results. Of the studies that utilized qualitative measures, themes included reduction in pain symptoms and the positive reception of a group-based pain management approach. Of the studies that employed quantitative measures, most demonstrated improvements in pain-related outcomes post-intervention, though not all statistically significant. Multidisciplinary pain programs may be of benefit to safety net patients with chronic pain. Further data collection is needed to determine the efficacy of these programs.

Bibliometric analyses assess the impact and influence of articles in the academic community. There is no previous work which used bibliometric analysis on microvascular decompression (MVD). This study aims to identify and characterize the current 100 most cited articles on MVD.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation, as a relatively new type of treatment, is a safe and non-invasive method for pain therapy. Here, we used CiteSpace software to visually analyze 440 studies concerning transcranial magnetic stimulation in pain research from 2010 to 2021, indexed by Web of Science, to clarify the research hotspots in different periods and characterize the process of discovery in this field. The United States ranked first in this field. Lefaucheur JP, Fregni F, and Andrade ACD made great contributions to this field of study. The most prolific institution was University of São Paulo. The four main hot keywords were neuropathic pain, motor cortex, connectivity, and non-invasive brain stimulation. There were three main points that were generally accepted: (1) definite analgesic effect of high-frequency rTMS of M1 contralateral to pain side in neuropathic pain; (2) there are inconclusive recommendations regarding rTMS of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in fibromyalgia and neuropathic pain; (3) there is low-quality evidence that single doses of high-frequency rTMS of the motor cortex may have short-term effects on chronic pain. This bibliometric analysis indicated that prospective, multi-center, large-sample, randomized controlled trials are still needed to further verify the effectiveness of various transcranial magnetic stimulation parameters in pain research.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe disease with motor and sensory function being destroyed, which leads to a poor prognosis and a serious financial burden. It is urgent to figure out the molecular and pathological mechanisms of SCI to develop feasible therapeutic strategies. This article aims to review documents focused on gene expression in SCI and summarize research hotspots and the development process in this field.

Optogenetics has revolutionized neuroscience in small laboratory animals, but its effect on animal models more closely related to humans, such as non-human primates (NHPs), has been mixed. To make evidence-based decisions in primate optogenetics, the scientific community would benefit from a centralized database listing all attempts, successful and unsuccessful, of using optogenetics in the primate brain. We contacted members of the community to ask for their contributions to an open science initiative. As of this writing, 45 laboratories around the world contributed more than 1,000 injection experiments, including precise details regarding their methods and outcomes. Of those entries, more than half had not been published. The resource is free for everyone to consult and contribute to on the Open Science Framework website. Here we review some of the insights from this initial release of the database and discuss methodological considerations to improve the success of optogenetic experiments in NHPs.